
So with this idea we would eventually have iPhone 18 running iOS 18. I always found it funny how iOS and iPhone number didn’t match either.

For example if Mac is at 11 and iOS at 14 the next Mac can be macOS 12 while iOS updates to iOS 14.5 until all OSes sync then they can move forward at the same pace. That’s even more confusing!! The next iPhone is 21? I always thought Apple would name iPhone just “iPhone” like they do iPad and if you want to get technical you can see “14th gen” if you cared enough in spec sheets.Ī way I always thought they can get everything in sync is by slowing down higher numbers and allowing lower numbers to catch up. People will get used to this because those that know are used to this.
#Iglasses for mac 2017 pro#
Who cares if there is a skip between years like going from Mac Pro 19 to Mac Pro 21. Apple already does something like this with Mac.
#Iglasses for mac 2017 update#
Same for product naming, dump the S update game and just make this year’s phone the iPhone 21. It’s really getting confusing having all these annual revision numbers out of sync. Hardest of agrees! Came here to say same thing. Apple is expected to announce when the event will take place soon, as well as other details developers could expect to encounter this year. Each have a main yearly milestone release that changes the first number of the version string.Īpple is anticipated to reveal the official name and numbers of its next milestone operating system releases at WWDC 2021, due to be held in the summer. It ultimately seems like a confirmation that Apple is changing the numbering strategy to bring macOS in line with iOS, iPadOS, and others. The numbering of beta releases and public releases hinted that this could occur, since the first number after the period is increasing multiple times in the year instead of being static. The update was conducted by an Apple employee who worked on WebKit, with the commit message "Update WKWebView getUserMedia delegate to latest proposal."īased on this discovery, it seems that Apple is taking the same numbering route for macOS as it has done for its other operating systems, instead of keeping it on the same main version for as long as possible. Please pardon our dust as we work behind the scenes to make improvements to the community.

Located in the open-source WebKit repository after being updated in February, references in the code found by 9to5Mac mention macOS "12.00" and iOS "15.0." This is an unusual discovery, as typically the WebKit code refers to future operating system iterations as "TBA" instead of using version numbers. 0 Comments / / Announcement: On Wednesday, December 5, starting at 9:00am PST 12:00pm EST, Apple Support Communities will be down a portion of the day. For macOS Big Sur and its Apple Silicon introduction, Apple moved macOS to version 11, and it seems the numbering convention will continue for the next version.

For quite a few years, macOS had a version number that started "10." followed by incremental changes.
